Hot-button topics generate discussion but can also divide communities. Do you allow controversial debates, and if so, how do you moderate them effectively? Have such discussions led to higher engagement or more conflicts?

I am for using controversial topics to spark engagement but I have a strict policy where the users cannot say anything without proof, and users cannot sat anything that can offend other people.

I am for using controversial topics to spark engagement but I have a strict policy where the users cannot say anything without proof, and users cannot sat anything that can offend other people.

Well, well, looks like we've got ourselves a real debate club here! I mean, who doesn't love a good old-fashioned argument over the last slice of pizza... I mean, controversial topics, right?

 

Now, about moderation, it’s like herding cats, isn't it? You want to encourage spirited discussion without it turning into a WWE smackdown. Clear guidelines are a must—like your policy of needing proof and keeping it civil. Personally, I believe a little humor can help lighten the mood, too. After all, if you can’t laugh at your own opinions, what’s the point?

 

As for engagement, it’s a tricky balance. Controversies can spark lively debate, but they can also lead to more conflicts than a family Thanksgiving dinner. You can get a ton of engagement, but sometimes people just want to throw virtual pies at each other instead of having a civilized chat.

 

In the end, it’s all about finding that sweet spot—encouraging discussion without letting it turn into a digital brawl. What do you think? Is it time to put on our moderator cap and break up some fights?