In a world dominated by big players, small communities often face the dilemma: should they compete directly with established giants or focus on building something unique?
What are the pros and cons of challenging larger platforms? Can smaller communities thrive by offering a personalized experience, niche content, or tighter engagement? Or does competing with big names always lead to burnout?
What’s your take on how small communities can grow and succeed in today’s competitive landscape?
You can’t realistically challenge Facebook on its terms. Neither X, Bluesky or any of the others. Or Reddit for that matter.
Simple reason, they have spaces for every kind of discussion under the sun. Same reason that a mom & pop shop, as you could call one, can’t compete with Walmart on range of goods because Walmart has everything. And it would be a mistake to try because you can only spread yourself so thin without serious backing which none of us have.
So the question becomes how you combat that. In an age where we are surrounded by Walmarts and Amazons, the only winning strategy is to offer something they don’t.
Pick a subject, a niche to specialise in. Have information, resources etc that the Walmarts and the Amazons don’t. (Or, I suppose, the Facebooks and the Reddits.)
Case in point, I’m a member of a Discord that generally focuses on the adventure games by Sierra back in the day. We have, as a collective resource, the accumulated knowledge of some fiercely knowledgeable people, and we collectively know things that are largely unknown elsewhere. It is a community rich in lore that you cannot find elsewhere. Unfortunately its on Discord.
When I say this, let me give you an example. Someone for giggles found the engine that lets you run, say, Space Quest I on the Game Boy Advance, and played it, and found a few bugs. The bugs were in the “huh, that’s interesting” category. Within a few days the community had gone over the 20-year-old GBAGI engine, found the bugs and patched them. Mostly for no reason other than because they could.
You’ll never find that kind of interaction on Facebook because the odds of getting the cumulative level of knowledge together in one place in a medium designed for transient engagement are simply too low.
I am against competing with any other communities, either big or small. Instead of being in competition, you should actually, utilize their member base, yo would use other forms to advertise your forums, and bring their members to your community as well. You don't benefit much for being in a competition with another forums, you will benefit more if you partner with them, or be in friendly terms
I don't think it's a sensible idea for smaller communities or forums to attempt to take on "big players" in the space. Simply put, you're risking "poking a bear" essentially and causing problems for yourself. This was relatively common 10-15 years ago among admin/webmaster forums, so much so that some sites began banning the advertising of competing sites... it got to a ridiculous situation, honestly!
Rather than attempting to compete with forums/websites that are far outside of your activity levels, I'd focus on producing more quality content for your own site, to hopefully engage new members and make them more likely to stick around into the future. Running a forum, or any kind of website really, is a long game - it's very rare for a website or forum to explode and be massively popular from day one. It takes a lot of effort, a lot of time, a lot of relationship building and a keen eye for details that others miss - so obviously, it's not for everyone. But running your own successful forum is an extremely rewarding experience for sure.
