Strong communities are built on shared goals and trust.
  • Join Administrata today and get 15 free posts!

    Register now and claim a free content order to boost your community activity instantly.

    Register Now

Guidelines How do you handle the lifecycle of older content within your community?

For best practices in creating and enforcing community rules.

InMyOpinion

Community Enthusiast
Community Moderator
Rating - 0%
Hello lovely members of Administrata!

Most of you probably already know that I am a huge necroposter (someone who replies to old threads that have died down)

But, I've been thinking a lot about how to manage older content in a way that keeps things fresh and useful without losing valuable discussions. Currently I'm working on a brand new forum with help of course and so I don't have this issue at the moment. But I have been curious as to how a forum administrator would manage older content on their forum. Do you archive old threads, revive them with updates, or let them naturally fade into the background?

I’ve seen some communities lock older posts to encourage new discussions, while others keep them open so people can add fresh insights over time. Personally, I love when older topics resurface with new perspectives, but I know it can also clutter things up if not managed well.

My question is, how do you approach it in your community? Do you have any strategies that have worked well?
 
Personally, I'm not against old content being revived if new discussion ensues. I'm also not against an old thread being linked in a new thread to continue a previously concluded discussion. Either method is fine but I doubt I'd implement a rule in either direction so as to not alienate solid discussion from continuing.

My issue is if the necroposting is an obvious attempt at spam. At that point, I'd handle it on a case by case basis.
 
Personally, I'm not against old content being revived if new discussion ensues. I'm also not against an old thread being linked in a new thread to continue a previously concluded discussion. Either method is fine but I doubt I'd implement a rule in either direction so as to not alienate solid discussion from continuing.

My issue is if the necroposting is an obvious attempt at spam. At that point, I'd handle it on a case by case basis.
I would agree that if the necroposting is span then of course it would be an issue. However, I also agree with you that it's a good idea to keep the topics open for discussion and linking an old thread to a new thread so people can still feel like it's newer without getting rid of any of the older conversations.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top