Strong communities are built on shared goals and trust.
  • Join Administrata today and get 15 free posts!

    Register now and claim a free content order to boost your community activity instantly.

    Register Now

ChatGPT and Other Chatbots Are Hurting Publishers Even Worse Than We Thought

Cpvr

Community Advisor
Community Moderator
Rating - 0%
Chatbots from companies like OpenAI and Google appear to be sucking up much-needed traffic to websites and massively screwing publishers over in the process.

As Forbes reports, new data from the content licensing platform TollBit shows that AI chatbots send a whopping 96 percent less traffic to publishers' websites than traditional search engines — even as companies like OpenAI and Perplexity promise tangible gains to media companies that partner with them.

When looking at metrics for 160 news and blogging publishers, TollBit found that AI companies' bots scraped those sites an average of two million times during the fourth quarter of 2024. Each page was scraped around seven times on average — a click-stealing scheme, if you will, that results in zero ad revenue for the publishers involved, since bot clicks don't generate any money for advertisers.

"We are seeing an influx of bots that are hammering these sites every time a user asks a question," explained Toshit Panigrahi, TollBit's CEO, in an interview with Forbes. "The amount of demand for publisher content is nontrivial."

Though chatbots do include links to original source sites when spitting out answers to questions that would otherwise be posed to a traditional search engine, these AI services also summarize the information scraped from those sites. As such, there's no reason for users to visit the links because the answer is already right there.

Some publishers, like the textbook marketplace-turned-edtech company Chegg, are already feeling — and fighting — the financial burn from its work being repurposed as AI results.

In a newly filed lawsuit, Chegg alleges that Google has "profoundly" harmed the publisher's ad revenue by including its content in the search giant's AI Overview feature. During a recent earnings call, Chegg CEO Nathan Schultz admitted that the damage to the publisher's bottom line is so severe, the company is considering going private or being acquired.

"Unfortunately, traffic is being blocked from ever coming to Chegg," Schultz said during the call, "because of Google’s AIO and their use of Chegg’s content to keep visitors on their own platform."

Along with hiring Goldman Sachs to conduct a "strategic review" of just how many hundreds of millions of dollars the company has lost, Chegg also retained the Susman Godfrey law firm for its suit against Google — and according to Ian Crosby, a partner at that practice, Google's AI Overviews are a "threat to the internet."



Source: https://futurism.com/openai-google-hurting-publishers
 
Zero click searches are a real problem for content publishers.

At some point, sites need to protect their intellectual property from being re-shared and regurgitated by AI.
 
Maybe publishers should focus less on ranking on search engines and more on social media marketing.
 
Zero click searches are a real problem for content publishers.

At some point, sites need to protect their intellectual property from being re-shared and regurgitated by AI.
It’s going to be an issue until they figure out how to actually send traffic back to the webmasters.

Perplexity does this well as they link back to the sites that they provide in their answers as does Chatgpt.

The key is that the sources need to be front and center of the answers.

However, diversifying your traffic sources is one thing that webmasters need to also focus on. You can’t keep all your eggs in one basket.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top